Rob Shearman <[email protected]> writes: > 2009/2/6 Christoph von Wittich <[email protected]>: >> diff --git a/tools/widl/proxy.c b/tools/widl/proxy.c >> index 0dcb737..88c0e53 100644 >> --- a/tools/widl/proxy.c >> +++ b/tools/widl/proxy.c >> @@ -122,10 +122,12 @@ static void init_proxy(const statement_list_t *stmts) >> print_proxy( " void *This;\n"); >> print_proxy( "};\n"); >> print_proxy( "\n"); >> + print_proxy("#ifndef USE_COMPILER_EXCEPTIONS\n"); >> print_proxy("static int __proxy_filter( struct __proxy_frame *__frame >> )\n"); >> print_proxy( "{\n"); >> print_proxy( " return (__frame->_StubMsg.dwStubPhase != >> PROXY_SENDRECEIVE);\n"); >> print_proxy( "}\n"); >> + print_proxy("#endif /* USE_COMPILER_EXCEPTIONS */\n"); >> print_proxy( "\n"); >> } > > I think a better solution to this would be to use proxy_filter as the > expression in the RpcExcept statements. > > Alexandre, what do you think?
We could do that, though it wouldn't help with the server case. A more generic solution could be to add a dummy reference somewhere in the exception macros to make the compiler believe it's used. I certainly agree we should avoid the extra #ifdefs. -- Alexandre Julliard [email protected]
