2009/2/28 Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org>: > Ben Klein <shackl...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Maybe someone should tell them that 1.0.1 is "broken" compared to >> latest development release. This isn't untrue - 1.1.15 has better >> success with a lot of apps. >> >> Basically, someone should tell them that Wine's "stable" branch is >> just a code freeze, and has nothing to do with crash-resistant >> stability. > > That's not true, we spent a lot of time fixing regressions for 1.0, and > it's clearly higher quality than many of the development snapshots. Of > course some apps may work better in 1.1.15, but some are broken too. > > Saying 1.0.1 is too broken to be supported is silly, it was working just > fine 6 months ago, and it is still working fine for many apps.
I don't see a 1.0.2 being developed though. I'm sure there are still a lot of bugs that could be fixed in 1.0.1 - correct me if I'm wrong here. But I based my statement on the fact that many users on #winehq have come in with a problem in 1.0.1, and upgrading to the latest available development version fixes their problem.
