On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton <l...@lkcl.net> writes: > >>>> how would you envisage doing client-side SMB named pipes? >>> >>> By doing the I/O through the wineserver. It has all the necessary >>> mechanisms already. >> >> ok - great. whereabouts? which ones? any existing examples? which >> existing code in wineserver utilises the existing mechanisms to which >> you refer? > > Look at the ioctl support.
ok - great. will do. i'll come back with further questions when i have worked out what you're hinting at. anyone else who is also interested in seeing a "better" design: i trust that they will also be looking at the ioctl support in wineserver with a view to being in a good position to contribute to the better design. l.
