On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 9:38 AM, Ricardo Filipe <[email protected]> wrote: > i know it's not what it does, it's an alternative someone refered in irc. i > was wondering what you think would be the correct approach, since both fix > the problem, the alternative just goes against the msdn documentation, which > has been refered as not reliable :D >
Please bottom-post on this mailing list. My patch is correct except for what I said earlier, so just take it, remove that bit and resubmit it. -- James Hawkins
