On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Paul Vriens <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > This fixes bug 17843 but I'm not sure it's a 100% correct. James didn't > change > this just for the fun of it. >
If you're unsure of the correct fix, you should write a test case that fails without your patch and succeeds with your patch. -- James Hawkins
