On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 8:13 AM, Massimo Del Fedele <m...@veneto.com> wrote: > 2) when winedib.drv is working good enough, wanted to "detach" it from > winex11.drv, so make another "driver" comprising DDB parts of wineX11 > and all optimizations needed.
This detaching thing is a little worrying. How will winex11 be called after detaching? Through winedib or gdi again? The first would not change functionality at all. The second is like the two driver method. It sounds like we ought to stick to the two separate drivers as a basis in development so we don't end up with something that can't be unglued easily.
