On Saturday 13 June 2009 19:43:30 Dan Kegel wrote:
> I did a git pull today, and saw this:
>
> copy programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/resources.h (57%)
> copy {programs/clock => dlls/d3dx9_36/tests}/rsrc.rc (57%)
> create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/tests/texture.c
> create mode 100644 dlls/d3dx9_36/util.c
> create mode 100644 dlls/msctf/compartmentmgr.c
> create mode 100644 dlls/oleacc/oleacc_De.rc
> create mode 100644 dlls/windowscodecs/Makefile.in
> rename programs/clock/rsrc.rc => dlls/windowscodecs/main.c (57%)
>
> Wha? Those are some crazy renames/copies...At least windowscodecs/main.c is a stub. So I take the LGPL license comment is the same. Git doesn't care about filenames much, and judges operations based on content. If the file's mostly the license header, it doesn't sound so insane to assume they're a copy (57% identical) Cheers, Kai -- Kai Blin WorldForge developer http://www.worldforge.org/ Wine developer http://wiki.winehq.org/KaiBlin Samba team member http://www.samba.org/samba/team/ -- Will code for cotton.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
