On Wednesday 01 July 2009 01:09:52 pm Alexandre Julliard wrote: > >> IsValidCodePage might be helpful yes, although marking it broken is > >> a bit too strong I think, it's just a difference in codepage databases. > >> > >> -Hans > > Yes, broken() seems strong but it's actually meant as > > behaviour_we_dont_want_to_replicate() in this case. > > I'm not convinced we don't want to replicate it. Using something like > IsValidCodePage in the implementation would be better than hardcoding > the list.
Some more testing suggests that the installable set is a superset of the valid codepages set. So we could just return the set of valid codepages for now and not hardcode anything. -Hans
