On 04.07.2009 23:55, Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: > Yuriy Kaminskiy wrote: > I'm wrong - I don't have working windows installation at hands and cannot > check > that. Well, no answer so far; I thought "should write test, code is more welcomed than just words", and noticed that such test already present, but disabled :-E. That's wrong. If test report breakage, it should not be simply silenced and forgotten for 6 years. See "[rfc] [kernel32/tests] enable sort order test" series in *-patches
- [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "Re: Regressi... Yuriy Kaminskiy
- Re: [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "Re:... Yuriy Kaminskiy
- Re: [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was "... Yuriy Kaminskiy
- Re: [rfc] lstrcmpi: order still wrong (was &... Dmitry Timoshkov