2009/9/17 Saulius Krasuckas <[email protected]>: > Today I saw two similar projects related to OpenGL: > > [1]: > >> glean is a suite of tools for evaluating the quality of an OpenGL >> implementation and diagnosing any problems that are discovered. glean >> also has the ability to compare two OpenGL implementations and highlight >> the differences between them. > > It seems be having win32 port also. > > [2]: > >> Piglit is a collection of automated tests for OpenGL implementations. >> >> The goal of Piglit is to help improve the quality of open source OpenGL >> drivers by providing developers with a simple means to perform >> regression tests. >> >> Current status is that the framework is working (though rough at the >> edges). It contains the Glean tests, some tests adapted from Mesa as >> well as some specific regression tests for certain bugs. HTML summaries >> can be generated (see below), including the ability to compare different >> test runs. > > Could these be of any use for our graphic guys -- Stefan and co.? > Well, they're mostly useful when you're maintaining an OpenGL driver. Mesa already uses these.
> Then there is PerceptualDiff utility I found some time ago [3]. Guessed, > could it also usefull for finding visual regressions of Wine? Probably > not, as it seems to be used for testing video codecs (but I may be wrong): > Possibly, but it would have to be in the context of a larger framework like e.g. CxTest or Appinstall.
