Re: [TRY 4] user32/tests: Add tests for STM_SETIMAGE and STM_SETICONmessage processing

[Dmitry Timoshkov]

"Ilya Shpigor" <shpi...@etersoft.ru> wrote:

+    flush_sequence();
+    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_BITMAP, (LPARAM)hbm);
+    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", 
FALSE);
+
+    flush_sequence();
+    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ICON, (LPARAM)hicon);
+    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", 
FALSE);
+
+    flush_sequence();
+    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETICON, (WPARAM)hicon, 0);
+    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetIconErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETICON on a static", 
FALSE);
+
+    flush_sequence();
+    SendMessageW(hwnd, STM_SETIMAGE, (WPARAM)IMAGE_ENHMETAFILE, (LPARAM)hemf);
+    todo_wine ok_sequence(WmSetImageErrStaticSeq, "STM_SETIMAGE on a static", 
FALSE);

You should use SendMessageA instead of SendMessageW to make the test run
under Win9x as well. Testing the return value of SendMessage would be also
helpful.

--
Dmitry.