Am Freitag, den 09.10.2009, 14:15 +0200 schrieb Paul Vriens: > If that sz99 (or now sz128) came from "looking at internal behaviour", > I'm not sure if that would raise some eyebrows. >
... and I simply allocate a "very large" string to ensure that no reuse of the just freed small memory portion can occur. Markus
