Michael Ost <[email protected]> writes: > I agree. And that's what your patch does, right? Would you like to > submit it to the wine-patches list? I think the case for it is strong, > especially since (1) you found that it fixes a behavior change in > WINEDLLPATH from November 2006 --- arguably a regression; and (2) it > works in the same way that LD_LIBRARY_PATH works, which is what Linux > programmers would expect.
Actually the current way is precisely what LD_LIBRARY_PATH does for relocatable installs. The loader first looks in the rpath $ORIGIN path, then in LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then in system directories. Wine does exactly the same thing. -- Alexandre Julliard [email protected]
