On 4/16/10 2:51 PM, André Hentschel wrote:
> ---
>  tools/winegcc/winegcc.c |    8 ++++++++
>  1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c b/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
> index 7023ff4..f780a69 100644
> --- a/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
> +++ b/tools/winegcc/winegcc.c
> @@ -1252,6 +1252,14 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>                       opts.unicode_app = 1;
>                   else if (strcmp("-m32", argv[i]) == 0)
>                      {
> +                        if (opts.target_cpu == CPU_x86_64)
> +                        {
> +                            const char *stdlib32path[] = { 
> "/usr/lib32/wine", "/usr/local/lib32/wine", "/lib32/wine" };
That's great for Linux, FreeBSD, etc., but in a world of universal
binaries (read: Mac OS X), this ain't gonna fly. I'm pretty sure that
when 64-bit Wine support does come to Mac OS X, people are going to want
to build it universal (i.e. 32-bit and 64-bit binaries in the same
file); I know I do.

Chip



Reply via email to