On 05/20/2010 10:00 AM, Hans Leidekker wrote:
But is it a (potential) issue? I guess not. If it's not an issue wee can leave the code as is, not?On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 08:04 +0200, Paul Vriens wrote:The main reason I'm asking is because we have several of these lingering around (and marked as 'FALSE' in Coverity).In this particular case we should just get rid of the goto.
-- Cheers, Paul.
