> > On 24 June 2010 05:18, Misha Koshelev <misha680 at gmail.com> wrote: > > Dan suggested tests ok during code freeze so blame Dan for my patches ;) > Certainly will. wine-devel is an open mailing list, and posting is > easy. You'll probably want to check with something like "git shortlog > -s -n" if the advice you're getting is actually worth taking. The way > I see it, you have more experience with getting patches accepted > yourself. More to the point, if you look at > http://source.winehq.org/patches/, you'll see 62909 is marked as > "Deferred", so resending in a slightly different form isn't going to > help much. Ah I see thank you. I take it this means deferred until post-code freeze (please correct me if incorrect).
> > > As for the patch itself, I'm not convinced there's value in having a > separate file for "Shape Drawing Functions", these are clearly mesh > constructors. I thought the original patch was mostly ok in that > regard, although there are (very) minor issues like using %d for > unsigned arguments and using imo ugly typedefs like LPDIRECT3DDEVICE9 > over simply "IDirect3DDevice9 *". > Ok thank you. Since we are in code freeze and I'd like to help wine, perhaps then I will just go down the list of 1.2 milestone bugs for now and see if I can help. Post code freeze, I can then start on the d3dx9 stuff as I am really not akin to having my own private repo as of yet and I think that going from a private repo to getting patches into Wine itself might be a little more difficult than I'd like - rather than doing it all at once... So thus for now work on 1.2 milestones. Then D3DX9. Off to work... Misha
