Henri Verbeet wrote: > > That basically comes down to testing for "fvf & (D3DFVF_RESERVED0 | > D3DFVF_RESERVED2)". In fact, that would also explain the results for > D3DFVF_XYZW, and make the explicit check for that redundant. >
Thank you so much for your helpful feedback. So I take it something like this: http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.com/file/n2850219/0001-d3dx9_36-D3DXDeclaratorFromFVF-returns-D3DERR_INVALIDC.txt 0001-d3dx9_36-D3DXDeclaratorFromFVF-returns-D3DERR_INVALIDC.txt Thx Misha -- View this message in context: http://wine.1045685.n5.nabble.com/Re-1-2-d3dx9-36-D3DXDeclaratorFromFVF-returns-D3DERR-INVALIDCALL-when-an-invalid-declarator-is-passe-tp2849210p2850219.html Sent from the Wine - Devel mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
