On 1/12/2011 07:56, Detlef Riekenberg wrote:
On Mi, 2011-01-12 at 00:48 +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:46:26 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] Partially implement _set_abort_behavior
Please search the patches queue first.
try 2: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/70231
try 1: http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/70136
Oh, I missed that. Why it's still not committed?
+static int MSVCRT_abort_behavior = MSVCRT__WRITE_ABORT_MSG |
MSVCRT__WRITE_CALL_REPORTFAULT;
- _set_abort_behavior get unsigned int, but you use an int. Why?
No particular reason, I don't have up-to-date msvcrt headers to check
that. So I'm wrong probably and it should be unsigned.
- mingw header have the same name as msdn.
Why are you using different names?
Different name for flag names? Because I thought we don't want to
include our own stdlib.h but only a system one, am I wrong?
msvcrt.h tells me:
---
* Other conventions
* - To avoid conflicts with the standard C library,
* no msvcrt headers are included in the implementation.
* - Instead, symbols are duplicated here, prefixed with
* MSVCRT_, as explained above.
---
Probably I got it wrong and I don't need to prefix these symbols because
there's no equivalent in libc (or there is?). But I'm not sure you mean
that, right?
