Henri Verbeet <[email protected]> writes: > On 3 February 2011 18:01, Charles Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'm for that. In fact, my humble opinion is that Wine on Mac should only >> use libraries that are part of the OS (i.e. only dylibs in /usr/lib and > I think Wine should have as few OS X (or Ubuntu for that matter) > specific hacks as possible.
It shouldn't have hacks, but I don't think it's unreasonable to use platform-specific services for things that don't have widely accepted standards. What really matters is that the platform-specific bits need to be small and well isolated, that's why we'd want others dlls to use schannel instead of going straight to OS libraries for instance. But having a small chunk of platform-specific code inside schannel with a clean interface doesn't seem problematic to me. -- Alexandre Julliard [email protected]
