On 02/27/2011 02:49 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Max TenEyck Woodbury<[email protected]> writes:
P.S. to AJ et al.
There is a _lot_ of documentation embedded in the wine code, but it is
hard to find at the moment. I'd like to see it indexed and this is the
program that does the extraction and indexing. Advice on making this
new version available and active are in order.
This has already been discussed, but documentation on the Windows API
doesn't belong in the source code. I've been accepting small amounts of
function documentation (which IMHO is pretty much useless) along with
implementations, but I'm not going to accept significantly more than
that. This is why you were directed to do this as a separate project.
But it _does_ belong someplace in the repository and there is already a
lot of it embedded.
I'm also not sure that what is in there already can really be called
documentation of the _Windows_ API. Rather it is documentation of what
we _think_ the API is. That is a small but important difference.
I'd also like clarification on why you think it does _not_ belong in
the source code. Some projects insist that documentation _has_ to be
part of the source code so that it will be properly maintained.
Max