On 3/3/11 2:45 PM, Alexandre Julliard wrote:
Jacek Caban<[email protected]> writes:
+ /* FIXME: Implement in more generic and safe way */
+ for(ptr = name; *ptr&& isdigitW(*ptr); ptr++)
+ i = i*10 + (*ptr-'0');
What's wrong with strtoulW?
We don't want to use strings like "+1" or with leasing spaces for
indexed access. The comment was more about considering moving it to
IDispatchEx implementation layer than parsing itself. BTW, it's a really
broken design of IDispatchEx. When a scripts accesses property by
integer index, the integer is converted to string and passed to
GetDispID, which parses it back.
Thanks,
Jacek
