On 19 September 2011 02:37, Juan Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > I wouldn't > hold your breath expecting these patches to go in as-is: if they > weren't good enough in 2004-5, they're not any better now. You'd want > someone who has an active interest in this area to have a go at them, > I believe, unless you can convince the original author to take them up > again. >
Thanks, Juan. I had a feeling that would be the case. I'll leave them be. Best wishes, Thomas
