On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:32:27PM +0200, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 11:44:24AM +0900, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote:
> > Bernhard Loos <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > + int debug_childs:1; /* also debug all child
> > > processes */
> >
> > 'debug_children' would be a better name.
>
> also
> unsigned int foo:1;
> please. (int foo:1 works, but is semidefined only ;)
Why the bitfield anyway?
Unless you are allocating a lot of copies of the structure
it is likely to generate more code than the saved memory.
David
--
David Laight: [email protected]
