On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 10:40:53PM +0800, Dmitry Timoshkov wrote: > Andrew Eikum <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Austin English wrote: > > > > >If no one opposes in the next few days I'll add it/start tagging bugs. > > > > I'm no more opposed to adding a pseudo-component. I simply > > > > suggest naming it unknown-audio or unknown-sound instead of > > > > "sound" such that people will hopefully still use the existing > > > > quartz, mmdevapi, winealsa, winmm&mci, direct-dmusic and direct-dsound. > > > > > > How is that better than simple 'unknown'? > > > > > > > Because then I can search for audio-related bugs where the component > > is not yet known. > > If the component is unknown probably there is no need to speculate about > the reasons and the source of the bug and investigate the problem instead? >
I can't investigate the problem if I don't know about it ;) If a bug is audio related, I want to know about it. I've been asking people to CC me on audio bugs, but that gets missed on a lot of them. Adding a Sound keyword would make searching for audio bugs trivial, so I can add myself to the CC list. Andrew
