Vitaliy Margolen <[email protected]> wrote: > I've spent enough time doing so and can tell that you are the first person > to move _all bugs_ to "unknown" component. And leave them there.
That's a gratuitous conclusion, where did get that idea? > And that > all developers can't be expected to read every single bug and try to > understand if it's a bug in their area or not. Not all developers are subscribed to wine-bugs, and even subscribed are not expected to read all the bug reports. > The whole point of triaging bugs is to collect enough data for a person(s) > familiar with the general area to do a followup investigation and eventually > fix the bug. Without knowing the area it's a waste of time for everyone to > do investigation on _every single_ new bug. In general yes, but it's not always possible for every bug to set the correct component without an investigation done by a developer. > One can't go just by bug subject - in most cases it's not accurate enough or > outright misleading. Same for the content, logs, etc. That's why there are also component and keywords fields. -- Dmitry.
