André Hentschel <[email protected]> wrote: > > Also just duplicating LCMapString tests is not a very good idea, it would be > > better to find a way to share the test data. > > that's not that easy as the parameter count is different, i would need to use > macros and i dislike that idea.
Since you are forwarding LCMapStringEx to LCMapString anyway I'd assume that their behaviour is mostly identical, and if you make a table with tested API parameters, and lcid as a DWORD in the table, then using LCIDToLocaleName to call LCMapStringEx instead of LCMapString sounds feasable. -- Dmitry.
