On 2012-04-01, at 6:06 PM, Henri Verbeet wrote: > Ideally applications wouldn't care at all about this and use the caps > instead, though in practice applications might use the PCI IDs for > workarounds for driver bugs or for capability detection.
Sounds good, so then are you okay with the patch with only the 6770M, since that has a different device ID? > The video memory is even more of a guess than everything else, in particular > because you can have the same model with different amounts of video memory. Fair enough, the comment in the code states that wine estimates the *minimum* video memory. Is there any issues with wine reporting more? If so, then there are cases where certain models within a series may have less memory than others. Thus wine could improve it's guess by having a different entry for each card (if necessary). That way the guess would never over-estimate the memory (assuming that's an issue). > The GL_NVX_gpu_memory_info extension would be very useful for this if it > wasn't experimental. Are there any problem with wine using the value from here instead of hard coding the video memory? Can bogus values show up? Can wine use GL_ATI_meminfo as well?
