On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Piotr Caban <[email protected]> wrote: > The calling convention is correct. The class name is _Container_base0 (not > _Container_base). > > I can't say anything about the implementation. I don't know what this class > is supposed to do.
Can you have a look at http://source.winehq.org/patches/data/88600 ? It and the bug it points to, http://bugs.winehq.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27698 , should have an adequate explanation of what the class is there for. - Dan
