> > > > >> I was just saying removing the interface name was not a good thing imo >>> or am I missing something? >>> >> Right, the interface name needs to be there as it matches the COBJMACROS >> name. Basically the C macro with a prefix. >> > Why? If you really want to keep interface name the better way imho is as > it's usually done in mshtml, like HTMLDOMTextNode_*, > so here you don't need to add anything like prefix. > > > _I is just 2 characters and won't cost a lot but hey seems a correct solution for me. And when you need to specify a class name ? Are you thinking about something like class_HTMLDOMTextNode_* ?
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of IDirec... Michael Stefaniuc
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Michael Stefaniuc
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Henri Verbeet
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Henri Verbeet
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Michael Stefaniuc
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Nikolay Sivov
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Michael Stefaniuc
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Michael Stefaniuc
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader: COM cleanup of ID... Christian Costa
- LPJUNK for COM Interfaces (Was: Re: [PATCH 1/3] dmloader... Michael Stefaniuc
