Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes: > Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > >> > This test demonstrates the problem reported in the bug 33331. >> > >> > This version of the patch moves the ExitProcess test into a child process. >> >> It still won't report failures properly though. > > As far as I can see ExitProcess returns 'failures' as the child process exit > code, but variable 'failures' is not visible from the tests. Do you have a > suggestion how to fix that?
You need to report the status a different way. For instance you could store it in a file. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org