Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes:

> Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote:
>
>> > This test demonstrates the problem reported in the bug 33331.
>> >
>> > This version of the patch moves the ExitProcess test into a child process.
>> 
>> It still won't report failures properly though.
>
> As far as I can see ExitProcess returns 'failures' as the child process exit
> code, but variable 'failures' is not visible from the tests. Do you have a
> suggestion how to fix that? 

You need to report the status a different way. For instance you could
store it in a file.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org


Reply via email to