Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes:

> Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote:
>
>> >> TIFF_VERSION_CLASSIC reflects the TIFF format itself, it's defined
>> >> to 42, TIFF_VERSION_BIG introduced in 4.x defined to 43.
>> >> 
>> >> Unfortunately TIFFLIB_VERSION define reflects the date, not the real
>> >> version. So for instance libtiff 3.9.7 has it defined to 20120922,
>> >> 4.0.0 - 20111221, 4.0.1 - 20120218. I don't see a way to differentiate
>> >> between 3.x and 4.x at compile time.
>> >
>> > I see that this patch is now marked as 'pending'. Are my arguments not
>> > clear enough?
>> 
>> You shouldn't check the version, but the actual problem (i.e. the size
>> of the offending type). Also please avoid unnecessary changes.
>
> What changes do you consider as unnecessary?

For instance, changing tsize_t when the problem is with toff_t.

-- 
Alexandre Julliard
julli...@winehq.org


Reply via email to