Wolfgang Walter <w...@stwm.de> wrote: > This is not a work around. > > todo_wine will not magically undo sending the bytes. > Please explain why you think that there will be now pending > bytes in the tx buffer if the tests fails. > > And why it does not make the next tests fail even if wine would > behave correctly then. > > res = WriteFile(hcom, tbuf, sizeof(tbuf), &bytes, NULL); > todo_wine > ok(!res, "WriteFile on an overlapped handle without ovl structure should > fail\n"); > todo_wine > ok(GetLastError() == ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, "expected > ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER, got %d\n", GetLastError()); > > > both tests would fail with wine actually. Wine does write 17 bytes to > com port these bytes now sit in tx buffer and need some time sending. > This distorts the following tests which tests the EV_TXEMPTY behaviour: > > Again 17 bytes are written and then the tests assume that one waits > for these 17 bytes (timeout value and messurement). > But really we wait for much more bytes being sent, up to 36. > > So even if EV_TXEMPTY handling would work the test for it will fail with a > timeout.
Does 'make test' pass without failures for you? -- Dmitry.
