Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> writes: > On Sun, 24 Mar 2013, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> This _may_ not be necessary, strictly speaking, but new versions of >> GCC (GCC 4.8) complain about this. (And there might be a fringe case?) > > How about this patch? I see it was not applied, but also did not > see a response.
It can't happen (and removing the last char unconditionally is broken anyway). -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
