Dmitry Timoshkov <dmi...@baikal.ru> writes: > Alexandre Julliard <julli...@winehq.org> wrote: > >> I don't see the point. Do you actually have an app that depends on this? > > When I started to work on this I had an app that has one of the reasons to > require running under Vista+ was the difference in overlapped IO behavior. > On the other hand the tests clearly show that up-to-date Windows versions > (including Windows XP) always return STATUS_PENDING for asynchronous read > and write on disk files. Is there another way to remove all those todo_wine > statements from the tests?
The tests also show that returning success is allowed for other file types, so I don't see a need to add complexity to treat files differently, unless there's a demonstrated need. -- Alexandre Julliard julli...@winehq.org
