On 3 October 2013 15:03, Stefan Dösinger <ste...@codeweavers.com> wrote:
> Am 2013-10-03 13:45, schrieb Henri Verbeet:
>> It sounds like you have some ordering issues in that patch set.
> Correct. Patches before patch 24 shouldn't be affected by that though.
> I didn't get around to splitting and recombining patch 24 and some
> later bugfixes yet due to other priorities.
> Unless you mean to imply that you disagree with the ordering of the
> first 23 patches, where the order is mostly a matter of opinion
> instead of technical constraints.
I don't think this patch makes sense before you actually unify the
location management. In particular, after this patch you'd have
location management in resources that really only does anything for
volumes, while from the surface point of view you'd have duplicate
location management.

Reply via email to