Correction: On #2, does that mean that the folks who ARE already Apache committers don't have svn access?
Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development [email protected] Phone: 512-286-6258 Building: 903 / 5G-016 Nicholas L Gallardo/Austin/I b...@ibmus To [email protected] 06/01/2009 09:44 cc AM Subject Re: [Wink] next steps... Please respond to wink-...@incubato r.apache.org Thanks Dims... On #2, does that mean that the folks who aren't already Apache committers don't have svn access? This is probably outlined in the contribution section of the incubator docs. I'll go do some self-educating there. As for references to employers, agreed. That was more of a recognition that we will have two known sources to see the project. That said, for those that are unfamiliar with the Apache process, using employer emails and such is fine. Dims is referring more to the intent with which we comment. i.e., we're participating as individuals and not as a corporation. Thanks for keeping us in line here... Regards, -Nick Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development [email protected] Phone: 512-286-6258 Building: 903 / 5G-016 Inactive hide details for Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]>Davanum Srinivas <[email protected]> Davanum Srinivas <dava...@gmai l.com> To 06/01/2009 wink-...@incuba 09:36 AM tor.apache.org cc Please respond to [email protected] Subject Re: [Wink] next steps... Nick, Folks, #1) I'll let you guys hash it out :) #2) Please create a new issue in JIRA and upload the code. I'll upload the code to svn from there. Please remember to click on the option to allow apache to use the code when you upload a zip. Typically we drop the code to a directory called contrib and then copy bits and pieces to trunk/branches. #3) I've created a wiki space in confluence. Please get started here. I'll figure out how to hook that into the main web site. Lot's of projects use this mechanism and will help us get started quickly. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WINK/Index thanks, dims PS: Everyone, please drop references to your employers :) We are all here representing ourselves. On Mon, Jun 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Nicholas L Gallardo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All! > > I'm really excited that we've gotten the project off the ground. A huge > thanks to Dims for helping guide us through the incubator process and > getting us to this point. > > With that... I thought I'd throw out a few ideas for next steps and see > what people though. > > 1) Project Guidelines - Before we start dropping code, it would help if we > all level set on a set of guidelines for how we want to see the project > run. I've seen other projects do this with a stated set of guidelines that > are posted publicly. If we do it that way, we have something to refer new > contributors to so I'm all for that if there are no objections. If there > are other suggestions, please fire away. > > 2) Project Structure - We need to decide on a structure for the > repository. In the past we've talked about having a structure where each > of the teams that are contributing code (IBM and HP) could drop their > entire code base and have it build/run. I still think that's a good idea. > As a next step there, I'm going to be looking into the incubator process > website to see if there are any particular constraints wrt project > structure, etc. > > 3) Project Website - We also need to get a project website up and running > that discusses a little bit about what we're doing and a wiki for some > common working space. Both of these should be available under the > incubator resources, but I haven't looked into exactly how we get that > setup. Does anyone want to look into that? If not, I'm happy to do so and > report back. > > 4) First Tasks - Once the above is complete, we're basically ready to kick > off the project in earnest and start building our runtime. I know the IBM > team is itching to get to this point and I'd guess the same is true for the > HP team. There was a note that went to the incubator that laid out a > little bit of this. I'll resurface that and add some detail. Maybe this > is where we can start laying out some of the planning via the wiki. One of > the first things that comes to mind will be an evaluation period where we > do some comparison of the HP and IBM codebases to see what features we want > to bring forth in the common runtime. > > Anyway... that's what I see for the short term (next day or so) before we > dive in. I hope everyone else is excited, this should be a fun project! > > Cheers, > > -Nick > > > Nicholas Gallardo > WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development > [email protected] > Phone: 512-286-6258 > Building: 903 / 5G-016 -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
