> "what shell we put in trunk in the svn in day 1" I think that's a fair point. I had started out with the assumption that we would go through a gradual merge process, but honestly that's going to take more time than it's probably worth to end up with something that's close to one of the two codebases.
I'll commit to getting my answer out for which one I want by Monday. Let's plan on having a formal vote next week. -Nick Nicholas Gallardo WebSphere - REST & WebServices Development [email protected] Phone: 512-286-6258 Building: 903 / 5G-016 "Baram, Eliezer" <[email protected]> To 06/18/2009 07:38 "[email protected]" AM <[email protected]> cc Please respond to Subject wink-...@incubato RE: Selecting the WINK basline code r.apache.org Completely agree we can and we should take code from both, my post is regarding the code that we set as the baseline, that on top of it we will add and modify. In simple words I tried to raise question "what shell we put in trunk in the svn in day 1" I hope I explained myself better. -Eli -----Original Message----- From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2009 3:26 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Selecting the WINK basline code Eli, I'll check in both codebases into the contrib directory over the weekend. There is no reason not to borrow from both codebases. thanks, dims On 06/18/2009 08:23 AM, Baram, Eliezer wrote: > Hi there > It has bean 2 weeks since the 2 submissions were uploaded to the WINK Jira, I believe it is time we open the discussion and make a choice about which of the two we prefer to be our baseline. > Please share whether you prefer to have submission #WINK-1 (IBM's) or submission #WINK-2 (HP Symphony) to be the code baseline, and why? > Let's make the best to get a decision by the end of next week. > > Regards, > Eli > >
