[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-57?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728657#action_12728657
]
Nick Gallardo commented on WINK-57:
-----------------------------------
+1 as well, I kinda struggled with the name OFFactory myself.
> Rename OFFactory to LifecycleManager
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: WINK-57
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-57
> Project: Wink
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Common, Spring
> Affects Versions: 0.1
> Reporter: Michael Elman
> Assignee: Michael Elman
> Priority: Minor
>
> OFFactory is really a bad name and I think that LifecycleManager sounds much
> better ;)
> So the proposed renames include:
> {code}package: org.apache.wink.common.internal.factory ->
> org.apache.wink.common.internal.lifecycle
> class: DefaultOFFactory -> DefaultLifecycleManager
> class: OFFactory -> LifecycleManager
> class: OFFactoryRegistry ->LifecycleManagerRegistry
> class: ScopeOFFactory -> ScopeLifecycleManager
> class: SpringOFFactory -> SpringLifecycleManager
> class: SpringOFFactoryPostProcessor - > LifecycleManagerPostProcessor
> {code}
> The {{ObjectFactory}} interface and its implementing classes remain unchanged.
> So in general the idea is: {{LifecycleManager}} is responsible to return
> {{ObjectFactory}}.
> I'm not so good in naming, so any comments will be appreciated :)
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
