[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-239?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12792088#action_12792088
]
Jesse Ramos commented on WINK-239:
----------------------------------
I think the primary motivation for creating a new module was simply that we
weren't planning on this being a default provider. I'm not opposed to moving it
if others agree that's the correct thing to do in this case.
> Support for generics as return type
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: WINK-239
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-239
> Project: Wink
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Providers
> Reporter: Juergen Zimmermann
> Assignee: Jesse Ramos
> Fix For: 1.0
>
>
> It would be good if Wink supports generics as a return type of resource
> methods (as does Jersey and RESTEasy), e.g.
> @GET
> @Path("/customers")
> @Produces({APPLICATION_XML, TEXT_XML, APPLICATION_JSON})
> public List<Customer> findCustomers(...)
> The Jersey solution: Use classname + "s", e.g. <Customers>
> The RESTEasy solution: Use classname + "Collection", e.g. "CustomerCollection"
> Actually I'd prefer the RESTEasy naming. The Jersey naming is also fine -
> it's more important that Wink supports generics at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
