Mainly because there is a similar test in TCK. On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Jason Dillon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Um, what is the point of jaxrs annotations on an interface? > > --jason > > > On Apr 25, 2010, at 12:14 AM, Michael Elman wrote: > > > Sorry to be the bad guy. But due to > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WINK-275 > > I'll vote -1. > > > > On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 8:47 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> +1 from me. > >> > >> As of this reply, we're up to: > >> > >> [5 ] +1 (3 binding, 2 non-binding) > >> [ ] +0 > >> [ ] -1 > >> > >> Ideally, I'd like to see all committers vote. Please submit your vote > >> if you've not yet done so! Thanks! > >> > >> mike > >> > >> > >> > >> On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Mike Rheinheimer <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>> (I sent this email 10:00pm US CST April 22, but nobody got it. Don't > >>> know what happened, but I'm resending it now.) > >>> > >>> Hi Winkers, > >>> > >>> I'm calling a vote to release Wink 1.1 > >>> > >>> The Maven staging area is at: > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-014/ > >>> > >>> The distributions are in: > >>> > >> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewink-014/org/apache/wink/wink-assembly-dist/1.1-incubating/ > >>> > >>> This release is tagged at: > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/wink/tags/wink-1.1-incubating > >>> (revision 937139) > >>> > >>> The vote will be open here for at least 72 hours. I'll keep the vote > >>> open until Tuesday May 27 at 8:00am US CST (93 hours) since the > >>> weekend is here. > >>> > >>> Please make special note of the language used to describe JAX-RS > >>> specification compliance in the > >>> apache-wink-1.1-incubating/docs/Apache_Wink_User_Guide.pdf and > >>> apache-wink-1.1-incubating/release_notes.txt files. > >>> > >>> Guide to testing staged releases: > >>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/development/guide-testing-releases.html > >>> > >>> [ ] +1 > >>> [ ] +0 > >>> [ ] -1 > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> mike > >>> > >> > >
