Just for the record, had to update a few tests because the output was slightly different (since Jackson allowed more configurable properties for output and we were expecting different default behaviors).
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Bryant Luk <[email protected]> wrote: > Nope. Just laziness :) I'll update it in a bit. > > On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jason Dillon <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is there any reason why the wink-jackson-provider isn't using the latest >> Jackson? >> >> --jason >
