On Wednesday, September 22, 2010, Jason Dillon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sep 22, 2010, at 5:01 AM, Nicholas Gallardo wrote: >> JMS support doesn't currently exist for Wink. Wink, to date, has been purely >> HTTP-based. I'm a little confused as to your motivation to go that way >> though. >> Is it to reduce chattiness (and number of outstanding number of connections) >> of >> clients/services? Or more to have clients submit longer running jobs and not >> leave connections idle? > > Really its just that I prefer using JMS, but need to still expose everything > as REST for potential web UI muck... that and REST is the sexy thing that the > bosses demand. ATM my only consumer is a Java client, but that doesn't mean > that I won't get a web2.0 client in the future. > > Its not a big deal... just wondering. > > --jason > >
We have very good integration between Tuscany and Wink (for rest binding). You could be able to plug and play with both JMS and REST bindings and acomplish your requirements. If you are interested, I could help you get started. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
