On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:18 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:35 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:52 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Kevan Miller <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> I'd be interested in hearing the community's views about graduation. I'd >>>>>> be prepared to support graduation, but will take work by the community >>>>>> to make this happen. So, I'd like to see some progress towards >>>>>> graduating. >>>>>> >>>>>> --kevan >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I definitely want to see Wink graduate. As for concrete steps, I'd >>>>> suggest that we start updating the project status page [1], which does >>>>> not reflect the current releases, community updates, etc. Also, how >>>>> diverse is the Wink community ? I know couple of independent >>>>> committers were added recently, but AFAIK, for graduation, the IPMC >>>>> really looks like for PPMC diversity. >>>>> >>>>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/wink.html >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Considering all the discussion around small but happy podlings and the >>>> encouragement for these podlings to graduate, I have updated the Wink >>>> project status page (at least a great part of it), and will be working >>>> on the necessary steps towards getting the project ready for >>>> Graduation. >>> >>> Those other small poddlings have so far at least had three active >>> committers, thats not the case with Wink where its a bit of a stretch >>> to describe the two who are about as "active". Maybe you could ask >>> specifically about Wink and what to do on on general@ but having a bit >>> more activity here would make the graduation decision easier. >>> >>> ...ant >> >> I tend to agree with you that Wink is more on the border line, but I'd >> think more towards graduating then retiring. Also, looking at past six >> months, there is actually at least three committers that have >> contributed some code or helped users applying patches. >> > > Active committers in the last six months shows just two: > http://svnsearch.org/svnsearch/repos/ASF/search?from=20110713&path=%2Fincubator%2Fwink > (and one of those has only done a single commit), and there's no other > active on the dev list that i could see, is there other activity > somewhere I'm missing? I don't want to see Wink retired either but > that doesn't look like enough activity to sustain a TLP. > Ok, it seems that I was looking at the commits archive and jumped back to 2010, instead of 2011.
> Starting the JAX-RS 2.0 work seems like a good idea to try to attract > new people, why not try that for a while? > > ...ant Yes, I saw that Raymond posted a related suggestion to start working on JAX-RS 2.0. Let's see how it goes. [1] http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wink-commits/ -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
