[Winona Online Democracy]

To Spencer Madsen

Subject: Response (in part) to Questions

Many estimates of union influence on wages have been made in the United
States and elsewhere. Many have been spun according to the particular
interest of the source. Don't expect any unanimity of opinion even among
relatively unbiased experts, but there seems to be some agreement that
currently unionized firms have at least a 10 percent advantage in wages (a
drop from more than 25 percent three decades ago) over nonunion counterparts
in the United States. Unions seem also to be responsible for better
peripheral benefits. The greatest advantage accrues, it seems, to blue
collar, nontechnical  workers. To explore further this murky area of
differentials you might wish to check with the Panel Study of Income
Dynamics of the Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann
Arbor(http:://www.isr. umich. edu/src/psid/ bibliography/biblio.html ),
which
provides a constantly updated list of materials on wage differentials,
including books, articles, book chapters, dissertations, conference
proceedings and government reports.

Of course, there is always the problem of cause and effect. Unionization may
not be the only cause of the differences in salaries among unionized and
nonunion organizations. Many studies explore other these conditions.
I tend to agree with your view of sweatshops and the consequences of
activities that may be taken against them. The criticism of third- or
second-world laboring conditions has validity in a few cases with  respect
to a lack of "democracy" (variously and tactically defined; but how did
contemporary Taiwan get in there?) and working conditions and environmental
problems. But in much of the world the options for immediate reform are few,
and much of the criticisms, from both the right and the left may have more
to do with old-fashioned protectionism --a return to pre-World War II days,
but now with underdeveloped countries as the target--than a genuine concern
for laborers in Asia, Africa or Latin America. Protectionism may be
justified occasionally, but often it is not, and its international
consequences could be disastrous. We have enough troubles as it is.



These topics extend well beyond Wal-mart (of which I am not an ally), but
their emergence in the Wal-mart discussions indicate again how local topics
often cannot be dealt with in isolation.


Roy Nasstrom




_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to