Joliene and others,
 
If it's any comfort, Winona is not alone in having it's Planning Commission (and other other appointed bodies) often at odds with the City Council.  My experience with communities around the State reveals a wide range of relationships, from close collaboration and mutual respect to total alienation and disagreement -- and everything in between.  One suggestion is a face-to-face workshop meeting at least annually between the Planning Commission and City Council, so that all have an idea of what the others think.  It doesn't avoid all problems, but at least they are communicating.  With almost all City decisions, however, the "buck" stops with the City Council and they may have their reasons and precedents for making decisions one way or the other.
 
Phil Carlson, Mpls
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Joliene Olson
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2003 1:31 PM
To: Online Democracy
Subject: [Winona] Point of information

To clarify a little, when WSU was planning to build the apartments on Sarnia they went to the Board of Adjustments and requested a variance from the requirements for off street parking for the students.  The Board of adjustments turned down the request.  Then WSU took the matter to the City Council and they approved the request.  Thus overriding the body that is designated to consider these requests.
The City Council doesn't seem to want to listen to the review groups.  The City Planning Commission has had similar problems with recommendations being over turned.  If the Council isn't going to listen to the recommendations, maybe there is no need for these groups.  One wonders!
 
In regard to the issues of landlords and the amount of off street required and provided, the City Planning Commission is apparently going to be discussing this issue in the coming months.
 
Joliene Olson
 
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.535 / Virus Database: 330 - Release Date: 11/1/03

Reply via email to