[Winona Online Democracy]



I've inserted some comments below.  I've also clipped items I'm not responding to for brevity.
 

    Glen Schumann
Winona, MN

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

H: 507.454.3056 W: 507.453.3567  W FAX: 507.454.1440

Visit my Family Home Page:
http://www.hbci.com/~gschuman/home.htm
Last Update: March 12, 2000

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of Bob Sebo
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 6:13 PM
To: online democracy
Subject: [Winona] Where (Local) Angels Fear To Tread

As all of you know I am just a simple country boy (at least I've written it often enough, you should know it by know), but here's my two cents worth on the war and Winona.  Or perhaps I should say, here's my perspective on how it is playing out locally. 
 
GS: Does growing up on a Wisconsin dairy farm during the 50s and 60s qualify me as a simple country boy? 
 
I'll preface my remarks by saying that my family is certainly in this hook, line, and sinker.  My brother is a colonel attached to the J3 in Tampa...they're the folks running the war.  My nephew (his son) is a 1LT in South Korea whose tour ends in about fourteen weeks.  Having said that, rumor has it that they may be pulling troops out of Seoul and redeploying them to Iraq this summer...regardless of how close you are to getting out.  This is not an abstract argument to me. 
 
GS: I appreciate the service of your family members. 
 
---------------------------------------%<----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second observation:  As schools of thought on the war have crystallized locally, and nationally, there is a certain self-righteousness to the tone of the statements coming from, for lack of a better word, "the right."  On her radio show on KWNO on Friday, Linda Chavez essentially said that you cannot support our troops and oppose our foreign policy at the same time.  I see this argument as jingoistic, oversimplifying matters greatly, and really insulting the loyal opposition, those on "the left."  Ruthie made a similar statement, and I just don't think it is right. 
 
GS:  I happen to agree with Ms Chavez.  I do not understand how one can really be supporting the troops while opposed to their misssion. 
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------%<------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
Fourth observation:  For us to be willing to dehumanize the enemy, by using the term animals, does put us a little too close to the fascist column for my taste.  These people are 12th century low life scum, but they are people.  I'm disappointed that my friends in this community would so easily disavow that fact.  That's why Abu Ghraib happened.  We should resist such temptation, no matter how appealing or personally satisfying it might be.  By dismissing these individuals as animals, we may also underestimate their ability to undermine our national goals. 
 
GS: Is scum higher on the life scale than animal?  Animals have some worth; scum is defined as "worthless" in my American Heritage dictionary.  Maybe I'm just being stubborn and obtuse, but I don't see a real difference. 
 
I remember back to the morning of September 11, 2001.  I was just finishing up my morning show when the first AP stories started coming in  (amazingly it took more than 20 minutes, the bureau people must not have believed it either).  I remember how I felt when I realized they weren't saying a small general aviation aircraft was involved in the first of the two New York crashes, and then the Pentagon, and then Pennsylvania.  When I knew these were attacks, and feared that the dead could number in the tens of thousands, my taste for blood was as strong as anyone else's.  I remember first hearing months later that bombs were being dropped in Afghanistan, and I was glad to know that we were responding against those responsible for 9/11.  To say, nearly three years later, that one is not a patriotic American if one does not lock step with every word coming out of the current administration...I say those are not the words of a true American patriot.  He or she would know that democracy, freedom of speech, and intellectual freedom, is every bit as important during wartime as during peacetime.  Every past effort to stamp out the free exchange of ideas and debate in our society has produced bad decisions.  Our strength is our diversity, and its ability to shape a cogent and effective public policy for this nation, regardless of the issues involved. 
 
GS: The right to dissent is quintessentially American.  I would never accuse one dissenting of being un-patriotic.  Dissent is different than "giving aid and comfort to the enemy".  I am not aware of anyone locally doing that, but I have heard reports of instances on college campuses where some were advocating for failure of our mission in Iraq.  THAT is un-patriotic and borders on treason in my opinion.
 
I too remember what I was doing and where that morning.  It ranks up there with the Kennedy assination.
 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------%<-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to