[Winona Online Democracy] Jan,
Those are wonderful suggestions. They are concrete, pragmatic, "doable," long range, and show a deep leadership perspective. Are there any City Council members reading these posts? (Or the Mayor?) What do you think of Jan's suggestions? Dwayne Voegeli July 16, 2004 ----- > >[Winona Online Democracy] > > >If I were Queen for the Day and had the ability to set the tone for annexation >issues this is what it would be. > >1. First, I would ask for the city to produce statistics that support the need >for a Township land to become a city domain. The terms of "need" vs "desire >would be clearly and logically stated. > >2. Second, when those statistic were gathered, I would bring City, County and >all Townships involved to the table to talk about these. > >3. I would appoint a fair and honest mediator who has had no prior biases or >involvement in the city or township. This person would have to be willing to >act in the best interest of growth trends and need. > >4. I would ask that all those coming to the table act civily and put aside any >personal agendas and past issues on this subject. If they are not able to do >this, I would ask them to remove themselves or remove them as this became >apparant. I would then appoint this committee or "governing body" to look at >all requests for annextions, now and in the future. This group would >consistently work as a "team" to resolve the annexation requests. > >5. Based on the findings, I would ask that an orderly plan be put in place for >annexation of Townships. This orderly plan would include a guideline related >to no "Balloon and String and Leapfrogging" Orderly annexation rules would >include property needing to be adjacent to city limits. The plan would also >include better guidelines on lot size based on where the development is going. >For example placing 100 foot lots in a rural setting is not in a rural settings >favor but it may be in a differnt location. > >6. Prior to moving into an other "annexable" area, the latest developed area >would need to have commitments completed such as, curb and gutter, traffic >solutions, and infra-structures that support the completion of that area. > >7. A request for annexation would go to this "governing" body, which >would look >at the benefits and need from all sides, which would enable "biased" decisions >to not take place. A request for annexation would be considered from all >parties involved and representing all populations. > >Oh to be Queen for the Day.... > > > > >---------------------------------------------------------------- >This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program. > >_______________________________________________ >This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy >All messages must be signed by the senders actual name. >No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list. >To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit >http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona >Any problems or suggestions can be directed to >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at > http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org > ------------ Dwayne Voegeli Winona County Commissioner, District #2 (507) 453-9012 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 359 Pleasant Hill Dr. Winona, MN 55987 ------------ _______________________________________________ This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy All messages must be signed by the senders actual name. No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list. To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona Any problems or suggestions can be directed to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org
