[Winona Online Democracy]



At the risk of resuscitating a dead horse, I have thought about the recent comments about participation in WOD, including the posting by Steve Schild about his research paper (which generated a lot of comment when it first came out).  Taking up his challenge, I actually read the whole paper.
 
I think the paper is well written, clearly organized, and generally neutral in tone - it was a good piece of research.  It poses questions up front with provocative quotes (by others) about the grand possibilities of E-democracy and others about how far we have yet to go.  But the bulk of the paper is simply an analysis of the answers that 41 of you folks gave about WOD.  We can't argue with plain reporting, even if the story doesn't conform to our wishful thinking.  Many people said they were hesitant to post for a variety of reasons and didn't like or trust the views of others.
 
It has been pointed out that there are perhaps only 200 WOD participants out of a population of 27,000 (50,000+ in the County) - about 1/2% to 1% of the population.  But the comparison I found myself making is not how does WOD stack up to its own goals (not terribly well), but how does it compare to other forms of democracy and communication?   The experience that I can share is as a city planning consultant, helping cities formulate comprehensive plans and zoning ordinances.  These documents form the broad framework and the detailed laws that govern all public and private development activities in a community for years.
 
I have not done careful research, but I can share anecdotally that I have rarely had participation over 1/10% in the planning efforts I have conducted, and yet when we reach even that number, people are thrilled at the turnout.  And if I were to ask those people if they like or trusted the process, many would give answers similar to the WOD survey. 
 
Think of the last time Winona updated its Comprehensive Plan or Zoning Ordinance - how many of you attended a meeting to discuss it?  If I were doing a plan for a city the size of Winona I would be delighted to see 25 people show up at community input meetings on the Plan.  Fifty would be astounding (we had 70 in St. Cloud, representing a greater community of 200,000).  These plans and ordinances are routinely discussed and debated by a couple dozen people on a task force, then reviewed by 7 Planning Commission members and 5 City Council members, at public hearings where there are maybe 10 or 20 others present.  The whole course of the community's future decided by 50 people, many of whom don't say anything.
 
By comparison, the discussions on WOD are quite large.  There are certainly ways we could make WOD a better forum, either technically or culturally, but I'm not so hard on us with the numbers we have, compared to the work I do.
 
Phil Carlson, Mpls
 
 
_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to