[Winona Online Democracy]

People can buy a book "Medical Fees in the United States" 2006 by James B.
Davis from Amazon for $129.95 which provides the nationwide charges for
Medicine, surgery, laboratory, radiology and allied health service. Medical
prices are not nuclear science but the discounting practices for non profit
entities leaves much to be desired.

Non profits in the thirties were give exemption from price discrimination
law suits which enable them to get special discounts from vendors and to
price their items differently to insurance companies, government and
individuals.  For profit companies "do not" by law have that right.  The
Federal Trade Commission has many test cases on their web site showing
actions by them to stop discriminatory pricing.  The Robinson-Patman Act,
the Sherman Antitrust Act prohibit for profit entities from this practice.
http://www.ftc.gov/bc/bchealthcare.htm

The Minnesota Attorney General and many other groups are trying to bring the
non profits into the same practice as is required by law of the for profit
providers.  

There are even some test cases which are pursuing the fact that special
prices offered the Veterans Administration fall under the rules that require
all "for profit providers" provide by law the same prices to any consumer.  

Paul Double 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Davis, William MD
Sent: Monday, March 06, 2006 9:41 PM

A few comments from a physician perspective.  First, the "overhead" of
commercial insurance varies considerably.  The best companies spend 8% on
administration (they pay out 92% of the premiums for health care) and the
worst may have an overhead of 50%.  Currently Medicare and Medicaid are
running about 3% overhead.
 
Second, physician offices and hospitals have a "price list" for every
procedure they perform (office visits, shots, office surgeries, hospital ER
visits, operating room costs, etc.).  They are all keyed to the CPT codes
(Common Procedural Terminology), a coding system developed by the AMA to
permit standardization.  The CPT code for an "average" office visit is
99213.  This makes it possible to compare charges across communities and
states for the same service.  There is a detailed description of each code
in a manual that is published annually to allow "coders" to determine which
code to apply to a particular service.  When new procedures are developed
(like laparoscopic appendectomy"), a code(s) is created for the procedure so
that insurance companies and the government can be billed.
 
What happens is that big payers (Medicare, Medicaid, BCBS, etc.) can dictate
to physician offices and hospitals what they will pay.  It is similar to
Wal-Mart telling its suppliers what they are going to pay for goods Wal-Mart
will sell.  It is a take it or leave it kind of deal.  If we don't agree to
the contract that BCBS sends us, we can't see their patients (we are "out of
network").  For example, the charge for a 99213 at our office, based on our
"charge master" (price list) might be $75.  We currently experience about
50% "discounts" from the big payers.
 
All patients get billed the same amount ($75 for a 99213) but what they owe
will depend on the deal with their insurance company.  So BCBS may have told
us that they will pay only $40 and we cannot "balance bill" the rest to the
patient.  You can see this on your insurance EOB (explanation of benefits)
that comes to you after a visit to the doctor.  It gets more complicated if
you have a co-pay.  You may have to pay $35 to your doctor and BCBS only
pays $5.  The office is forced to "write off" the difference.  However, if
you have no insurance, you get the bill for $75 and end up paying the whole
bill.  This is not so bad for a $75 office visit but it can be a catastrophe
for a $50,000 coronary artery bypass surgery.
 
Some hospitals and clinics are discounting bills to patients without
insurance to match the discounts they give to the insurance companies but
most are not doing that.  Fortunately, the number of uninsured patients is
still small in Minnesota but it is a growing number as employers stop
offering insurance to their employees.
 
Sorry for this long note but it may be helpful to see what is going on from
an "insiders" perspective.
 
William Davis MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Winona Online Democracy]



_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to