[Winona Online Democracy]

This is related to our discussion of medical fees and the impact of
insurance.  While it looks pretty good that they are spending 76 to 83%
of premium dollars on health care, they are including the cost of
processing claims and selling insurance as though it was being spent on
patients.  If you add in the cost of processing the insurance in
hospitals and doctor's offices, the burden for patients is even higher.
What is also unknown is whether companies include the cost of processing
claims and selling insurance in the amount they spend on patient care.
Bill

William Davis MD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
507.454.5050 ext 623
825 Mankato Ave
Winona MN 55987
 
American Medical News
March 6, 2006
Health plans make more, spend less in 2005
By Jonathan G. Bethely

If physicians needed any more indication of tightening reimbursement,
how 
about this - not only did profits for the biggest health plans go up
last 
year, but those plans also continued to cut the percentage of revenue
they 
spend on care.

The medical-cost ratio - also called the medical-loss ratio or
medical-care 
ratio - is the key number for health plans in terms of their level of 
profitability. That ratio, simply, is the percentage of dollars the 
companies spend on health care.

Whereas 10 years ago many plans had medical-cost ratios in the high 80s
or 
90s, now the highest percentage among large, publicly traded health
insurers 
is Health Net, at 83.9%. Aetna, which had a medical-cost ratio well into
the 
90s when CEO John Rowe, MD, took over in 2000, recorded a ratio of 76.9%
in 
2005, Dr. Rowe's final full year before his retirement. That was the
lowest 
medical-cost ratio for the nation's largest publicly traded plans.

Medical-loss ratios for 2005 (Source: Company 10-K, year-end filings
with 
the Securities and Exchange Commission):

76.9% - Aetna
82.3% - Cigna
83.9% - Health Net
83.2% - Humana
78.6% - UnitedHealth Group
80.6% - WellPoint

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2006/03/06/bisd0306.htm


Comment:  Clearly, one-fifth of health insurance premium dollars are not

being spent on health care, but are consumed by the insurers. What does
not 
show up in these numbers is the cost of the administrative burden that
these 
insurers place on the health care delivery system. The billing and
insurance 
related functions for physicians and hospitals burn up another 12
percent or 
so of the premium dollar (Kahn et al, Health Affairs, Nov/Dec 2005). Add

these together, and that is about one-third of the premium dollar.

We are very concerned about the continued escalation of health care
costs. 
New technology and pharmaceuticals are adding to the spending on
physicians, 
hospitals, laboratories and other health care services. We fret about
these 
expenditures within the two-thirds of the insurance premium that
actually 
makes it down to the health care system, yet we are ignoring the
one-third 
that is wasted on administrative services that provide no health benefit
for 
the patient.

We are enriching this industry for providing coverage for the healthy 
workforce and their young, healthy families, and for covering the
healthy 
sub-sector of the individual insurance market. We taxpayers are footing
the 
bill for the population subgroups with greater health care needs.

We certainly are not receiving much value from the insurers - letting
them 
have the easy stuff at a very high cost. Wouldn't it be more logical to 
target their waste, rather than slowing spending growth by making health

care unaffordable for those who do have needs?

Why do we keep hearing that eliminating this industry isn't feasible?
You 
would think that anyone with a modicum of business sense would believe
that 
keeping them in charge is no longer feasible. 


_______________________________________________
Quote-of-the-day mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/quote-of-the-day

_______________________________________________
This message was posted to Winona Online Democracy
All messages must be signed by the senders actual name.
No commercial solicitations are allowed on this list.
To manage your subscription or view the message archives, please visit
http://mapnp.mnforum.org/mailman/listinfo/winona
Any problems or suggestions can be directed to
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you want help on how to contact elected officials, go to the Contact page at
 http://www.winonaonlinedemocracy.org

Reply via email to